> tldr; Don't make assertions about stuff you don't understand.
Yes, that pretty much covers your comment. It's not like they won't just investigate all wallets intermediate to major exchanges/merchants as leads. It's not like FinCEN doesn't have decades of experience tracking mass flows. It's not like they won't invoke guilt by association for any of the four horsemen.
Please, take a look at the properties of Brands's blinded signatures for an example of an actually anonymous currency (it has other problems though).
Yes, that pretty much covers your comment. It's not like they won't just investigate all wallets intermediate to major exchanges/merchants as leads. It's not like FinCEN doesn't have decades of experience tracking mass flows. It's not like they won't invoke guilt by association for any of the four horsemen.
Please, take a look at the properties of Brands's blinded signatures for an example of an actually anonymous currency (it has other problems though).